De lo que ocurre cuando no se tiene pajolera idea.
Of what happens when you do not learn.For some time this part are mainly online, a number of symbols associated with libertarian communism product of ignorance of some members, such symbols combine to own the anarchist movement circulated with the sickle and hammer of Bolshevism, which can only come from ignorance of libertarian communism both as Marxism.A sample of the symbols:
These symbols are not libertarian communism (or anarcho-communism), let's see why.1-The Libertarian Communism have as a parent to little known Italian anarchist Carlo Cafiero (1846-1892). In
his book Anarchy and Communism, written in 1880, a revision to the
collectivism of Bakunin, claiming that the theory of labor value
(society is obtained from the proportional to what has been produced,
which, means of production
are collective, but the produce is individual) would produce an unequal
society, with class distinctions (between skilled and awkward),
undesirable for anarchism. Later Peter Kropotkin (1842-1921) met Cafierto and matured his ideas. Postings
in 1892 The Conquest of Bread, key work that would define libertarian
communism, showing a society based on the principle of need (I produced
is distributed according to need, as communal being both the means of
production as the products themselves, which achieves a totally egalitarian society). Libertarian
communism is opposed to the dictatorship of the proletariat itself of
Marxism as a point to reach egalitarian society, like the rest of the
anarchist movement.Libertarian communism is therefore a branch of anarchism, anarchist product of thought, not a synthesis of Marxist theory. In
fact, it does not incorporate any of Marxist theory, as it defends the
labor value and the existence of money in the early stages of socialism,
something that is not shared with libertarian communists.The 2-circle-symbol was not used by the anarchist movement until the late 1960s. The
symbol of the hammer and sickle began to be used by the Bolsheviks
(Marxist) Russians in 1917, symbolizing the revolution uniting peasants
and workers. Both symbols are as much after the birth of libertarian communism. The
symbols found above are the product of people who, knowing the origins
of libertarian communism, thinking it was the synthesis of anarchism and
Marxism, have decided to create a symbol that represents a
misconception.The
3-libertarian communism name comes from the synthesis, but the
opposition, often being called Marxism by anarchists as "Authoritarian
Communism".4-Nor
is the synthesis of communism and anarchism Maxismo theory known as
Libertarian, since this theory defends the dictatorship of the
proletariat, though, giving less importance to the game and more to
groups and workers councils, forming structures libertarian (but not antitautoritarias, as in the case of anarchism). Marxism is therefore a branch of Marxism Libertarian that has nothing to do with anarchism.From
all this it follows that the symbols seen before are fruits of error
and ignorance as to the theory which claims to defend, or at least, in
terms of knowledge about the history of the theory. Avoid Pot draw things this way.Libertarian
Communism has no symbols themselves, although often used the classic
symbols of anarchism (The black flag, the circle-, black star), or
anarcho-syndicalism (rojinegra iconography).
Marxism-leninism: your old boss is replaced with a bureaucrat. It is plainly authoritarian and I would hope most anarchists don't fall into it.
ResponderEliminar